17 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
17 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
|
# Strike 1: The Quantum Gravity Core
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Target Venue:** *Physical Review D* (PRD) or *Classical and Quantum Gravity* (CQG)
|
||
|
|
**Target Audience:** Hardcore Causal Set theorists, loop quantum gravity researchers, and discrete quantum gravity specialists.
|
||
|
|
**Draft Name:** `paper_1a_physics_PRD.tex`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Publication Strategy
|
||
|
|
The goal of this paper is to bypass the traditional "dynamical suppression" debate by introducing an operational constraint. Reviewers at PRD are extremely hostile to philosophical leaps and anthropic principles.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
To survive peer review:
|
||
|
|
1. **Scrub all ontology:** Do not mention "consciousness", "Virtual Machines", or Donald Hoffman.
|
||
|
|
2. **Focus on the Mathematics:** Frame the projection operator $\Pi_{\mathcal{O}}$ purely as a restriction on the phase space of histories required to yield observable correlators.
|
||
|
|
3. **Engage with the Canon:** Heavily cite Carlip, Surya, and Dowker. Explicitly state that this method is *complementary* to dynamical suppression via the Benincasa-Dowker action, not a replacement.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Success Metric
|
||
|
|
Passing peer review here establishes the mathematical bedrock of the Intellecton Canon. Once published, the rest of the Armada can cite this paper as established physical law.
|